VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-04-18 Thread c400
Found the solution! Changing BIOS settings to the values on the screenshots above made the trick! Supermicro X9SRI-F now works with PCI-E USB 3.0 card on x86_64 linux

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-03-06 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, den 24.02.2017, 16:41 +0300 schrieb c400: > when i disable IOMMU -> "Enable Intel DMA Remapping Device by > default" > the USB flash drive becomes completely invisible. > Same stuff when i completely disable recompile kernel without IOMMU The DMA map for the device seems to be incorrec

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-02-24 Thread c400
when i disable IOMMU -> "Enable Intel DMA Remapping Device by default" the USB flash drive becomes completely invisible. Same stuff when i completely disable recompile kernel without IOMMU 2017-02-19 6:48 GMT+03:00 c400 : > [ 804.441424] usb 4-1: new SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-02-20 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Sonntag, den 19.02.2017, 06:48 +0300 schrieb c400: > [  805.771818] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] Attached SCSI removable disk > [  805.811101] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 > [  805.811108] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [07:00.0] fault addr > fff98000 [fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not se

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-02-18 Thread c400
[ 804.441424] usb 4-1: new SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd [ 804.462165] usb 4-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0951, idProduct=1656 [ 804.462169] usb 4-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 [ 804.462172] usb 4-1: Product: DT Ultimate G2 [ 804.462174] usb 4

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-02-11 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 04:32:05PM +0300, c400 wrote: > no, i`ve already tested and wrote about useless experiments > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-usb@vger.kernel.org/msg80329.html Ok, but please remember, we have no memory of things at all, if you do not properly quote previous emails and t

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-02-11 Thread c400
no, i`ve already tested and wrote about useless experiments https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-usb@vger.kernel.org/msg80329.html 2017-02-11 0:45 GMT+03:00 c400 : > sorry, got the letter branch cleaned, so haven`t seen your reply > > tested on 4.9.9 kernel > > [13964.125187] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Attac

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-02-10 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:45:58AM +0300, c400 wrote: > sorry, got the letter branch cleaned, so haven`t seen your reply > > tested on 4.9.9 kernel Has this worked on older kernels? If so, can you use 'git bisect' to track down the offending patch? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this

VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-02-10 Thread c400
sorry, got the letter branch cleaned, so haven`t seen your reply tested on 4.9.9 kernel [13964.125187] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Attached SCSI removable disk [13964.150525] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 [13964.150532] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [02:00.0] fault addr fffb1000 [fault reason 0

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-01-16 Thread Mathias Nyman
Obviously there is some sort of communications problem. Either the device stopped transferring data or else the xHCI host controller stopped receiving it. From the usbmon trace, there's no way to tell which. However, if the device works okay with an EHCI host controller or on another computer,

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-01-14 Thread c400
tested this controller on the this and other PC with linux x86_32 and windows, everything works ok btw i have 2 similar controllers and the same problems 2017-01-14 16:53 GMT+03:00 c400 : > a262eb551300 320471228 S Ci:4:001:0 s a3 00 0001 0004 4 < > a262eb551300 320471237 C Ci:4:001:0

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-01-14 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017, c400 wrote: ... > a262eb5516c0 321863050 S Bo:4:002:2 -115 31 = 55534243 6e00 > 0010 8a28 0008 1008 00 > a262eb5516c0 321863062 C Bo:4:002:2 0 31 > > a26333a3d3c0 321863073 S Bi:4:002:1 -115 4096 < > a26333a3d3c0 321863103 C Bi:

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-01-14 Thread c400
a262eb551300 320471228 S Ci:4:001:0 s a3 00 0001 0004 4 < a262eb551300 320471237 C Ci:4:001:0 0 4 = 03020100 a262eb551300 320471240 S Co:4:001:0 s 23 01 0010 0001 0 a262eb551300 320471242 C Co:4:001:0 0 0 a262eb551300 320471244 S Ci:4:001:0 s a3 00 0002 0004 4 < f

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-01-13 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, c400 wrote: > kernel 4.9.3 > still not working > latest log: > > [ 196.984424] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] 31293440 512-byte logical blocks: > (16.0 GB/14.9 GiB) > [ 196.984564] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off > [ 196.984566] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 23 00 00 00 > [ 196

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-01-13 Thread c400
kernel 4.9.3 still not working latest log: [ 196.984424] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] 31293440 512-byte logical blocks: (16.0 GB/14.9 GiB) [ 196.984564] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off [ 196.984566] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 23 00 00 00 [ 196.984689] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] No Caching mode page foun

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2017-01-10 Thread c400
hi! Using 4.9.2 kernel. Still no success with VL805 USB 3.0 i can give a remote shell to test and reproduce the bug any help? 2016-09-23 0:47 GMT+03:00 c400 : > btw > i've tested a liitle better and the disk is visible, but write errors occurs > after ejecting and inserting it is invisible again

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-22 Thread c400
btw i've tested a liitle better and the disk is visible, but write errors occurs after ejecting and inserting it is invisible again [129416.884960] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] 1250263728 512-byte logical blocks: (640 GB/596 GiB) [129416.885429] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off [129416.885434] sd 7:0:0

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-21 Thread c400
02:00.0 USB controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VL805 USB 3.0 Host Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 30 [XHCI]) Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VL805 USB 3.0 Host Controller Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 41 Memory at fbb0 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-21 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, c400 wrote: > >Maybe you can put the quirk in /etc/modprobe.d so it will be used > >automatically. Add a line to /etc/modprobe.d/local.conf saying: > > >options xhci_hcd quirks=0x00800090 > > i`ve done and it works Congratulations! Can you post the "lspci -v -

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-15 Thread c400
roger that i`ll test it and write back after weekends 2016-09-15 17:29 GMT+03:00 c400 : >>Obviously you're not reading my email messages. I told you quite >>clearly: >> >>After unloading the xhci-pci and xhci-hcd modules: >> >>sudo modprobe xhci_hcd quirks=0x00800090 >>sud

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-15 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, c400 wrote: > >Obviously you're not reading my email messages. I told you quite > >clearly: > > > >After unloading the xhci-pci and xhci-hcd modules: > > > >sudo modprobe xhci_hcd quirks=0x00800090 > >sudo modprobe xhci_pci > ==

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-15 Thread c400
>Obviously you're not reading my email messages. I told you quite >clearly: > >After unloading the xhci-pci and xhci-hcd modules: > >sudo modprobe xhci_hcd quirks=0x00800090 >sudo modprobe xhci_pci === this part of commands from y

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-15 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, c400 wrote: > XHCI_NO_64BIT_SUPPORT > can't find such flag in my kernel config. May be you can help me to > find it in menuconfig tree? It's not there. Obviously you're not reading my email messages. I told you quite clearly: After unloading the xhci-pci and xhci-h

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-14 Thread c400
XHCI_NO_64BIT_SUPPORT can't find such flag in my kernel config. May be you can help me to find it in menuconfig tree? 2016-09-14 23:25 GMT+03:00 c400 : > yep! enabling You need to enable CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG. did the trick! > here is my new dmesg output: > > > 2016-09-14 22:39 GMT+03:00 c400 : >>

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-14 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, c400 wrote: > yep! enabling You need to enable CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG. did the trick! > here is my new dmesg output: Did you use the 32-bit DMA quirks option for xhci_hcd? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a mess

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-14 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, c400 wrote: > 2016-09-14 15:43 GMT+03:00 Oliver Neukum : > > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 15:22 +0300, c400 wrote: > >> may be i can help to test something else? I am ready and have enough free > >> time Did you try Mathias's suggestion of forcing DMA to use 32 bits? After unloadin

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-14 Thread c400
2016-09-14 15:43 GMT+03:00 Oliver Neukum : > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 15:22 +0300, c400 wrote: >> may be i can help to test something else? I am ready and have enough free >> time > > You may need to mount debugfs at /sys/kernel/debug > > HTH > Oliver > > mount -t debugfs none

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-14 Thread Oliver Neukum
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 15:22 +0300, c400 wrote: > may be i can help to test something else? I am ready and have enough free time You may need to mount debugfs at /sys/kernel/debug HTH Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the bo

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-14 Thread c400
may be i can help to test something else? I am ready and have enough free time 2016-09-12 20:44 GMT+03:00 c400 : > [182047.000570] xhci_hcd :02:00.0: remove, state 4 > [182047.000577] usb usb4: USB disconnect, device number 1 > [182047.023980] xhci_hcd :02:00.0: Host not halted after 16000

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-12 Thread c400
[182047.000570] xhci_hcd :02:00.0: remove, state 4 [182047.000577] usb usb4: USB disconnect, device number 1 [182047.023980] xhci_hcd :02:00.0: Host not halted after 16000 microseconds. [182047.023982] xhci_hcd :02:00.0: Host controller not halted, aborting reset. [182047.023996] xhci_h

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-12 Thread Dave Jiang
On 09/12/2016 03:56 AM, Mathias Nyman wrote: > On 10.09.2016 17:19, Greg KH wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:33:05PM +0300, c400 wrote: >>> my DMESG file >> >>> [ 13.331618] usb 3-1: device descriptor read/64, error -110 >>> [ 28.535180] usb 3-1: device descriptor read/64, error -110 >>> [

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-12 Thread Mathias Nyman
On 10.09.2016 17:19, Greg KH wrote: On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:33:05PM +0300, c400 wrote: my DMESG file [ 13.331618] usb 3-1: device descriptor read/64, error -110 [ 28.535180] usb 3-1: device descriptor read/64, error -110 [ 28.737931] usb 3-1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-10 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:33:05PM +0300, c400 wrote: > my DMESG file > [ 13.331618] usb 3-1: device descriptor read/64, error -110 > [ 28.535180] usb 3-1: device descriptor read/64, error -110 > [ 28.737931] usb 3-1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd > [ 33.840034] usb 3-1

VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-10 Thread c400
my DMESG file [0.00] Linux version 4.7.3-gentoo (root@ss) (gcc version 4.9.3 (Gentoo 4.9.3 p1.5, pie-0.6.4) ) #1 SMP Sat Sep 10 09:38:53 Local time zone must be set--see zic [0.00] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-4.7.3-gentoo root=UUID=508392f4-d7fb-4449-

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-10 Thread Greg KH
Always keep discussions on the mailing list... On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:10:49PM +0300, c400 wrote: > tested on 4.4.6, 4.6.4, 4.7.0, 4.7.1, 4.7.2, 4.7.3 What do the boot messages say for 4.7.3 when you boot in a 64bit kernel? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un

Re: VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-10 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:36:16PM +0300, c400 wrote: > i`ve got two PCI-E USB controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VL805 USB > 3.0 Host Controller (rev 01) > The problem is that both of them works on ASUS P8H61-MX R 2.0 with x86 > and x86_64 kernels > > but on my Supermicro X9SRI-F both of them wor

VL805 USB 3.0 does not see connected devices (only on x86_64) (x86 is ok)

2016-09-09 Thread c400
i`ve got two PCI-E USB controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VL805 USB 3.0 Host Controller (rev 01) The problem is that both of them works on ASUS P8H61-MX R 2.0 with x86 and x86_64 kernels but on my Supermicro X9SRI-F both of them works only on x86 kernel. Tried with vanilla gentoo install and manu