On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> > It sounds like an old version of a Novell product is making a newer
> > kernel spit out a warning message.
>
> Originally that was all that it was, but now I am seeing the product in
> question not even see the hard drive despite the fact that it is
On 2/21/2008 12:17 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:36:23AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
[Greg KH]
I know he's in the CC:, but I'm not sure he's reading this
thread, and I'm hesitant to bother people about things out of the
blue unless I h
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:36:23AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
>
> > On 2/20/2008 2:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> > >
> > >> In other words: I don't think that's likely to be practical in the
> > >> prese
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> On 2/20/2008 2:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> >
> >> In other words: I don't think that's likely to be practical in the
> >> present instance. If you have reason to believe otherwise (past
> >> positive exp
On 2/20/2008 2:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
In other words: I don't think that's likely to be practical in the
present instance. If you have reason to believe otherwise (past
positive experience with Novell, for instance), I'd be glad to hear
it.
Greg K
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> In other words: I don't think that's likely to be practical in the
> present instance. If you have reason to believe otherwise (past positive
> experience with Novell, for instance), I'd be glad to hear it.
Greg KH may be able to help in that respect.
On 2/20/2008 12:15 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Hmm. One thing which just sprang to mind, in the stab-in-the-dark
category: in 2.6.24.2, launching the program on some machines gave
warnings along the lines of "this program is using a deprecated
ioctl, pleas
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> > What do you mean by "does not see the drive"?
>
> Its detect-hardware-and-report mode shows a HD size of 0 (which is what
> it has showed in cases where the kernel has not detected the drive), its
> detect-partitions-and-report mode shows no partitio
(I suspect that some of the existing CC:s can now be dropped, and others
might need to be added if indeed this is worth discussing on kernel
lists at all, but I don't know what the protocol on that is so I have
left all of them in for the moment.)
On 2/20/2008 10:50 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> With those two problems out of the way, what is left is the hard-drive
> issue, and that is also halfway fixed by enabling ACPI. Specifically, it
> is "fixed" in that the kernel sees the hard drive and I can mount it,
> but it is not fixed in that the p
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Until this thread, I was not even aware that ACPI was related to
USB; I had largely conflated it with a similar acronym which I
think is related to power management and which I can suddenly not
even find in my
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Messages sent to my address directly are explicitly not filtered
into the folders I have set up for various mailing lists, so that
if someone does send me a "heads up" reply for a specific topic on
a list to wh
Andrew B wrote:
> Windows, which is what I have to use for work purposes.
aha -- my condolences ;)
Take care. Your last reply made as much sense
as we're likely to make of this one. Thanks.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalabilit
On 2/17/2008 2:20 AM, Paul Jackson wrote:
Andrew wrote:
(Since there are multiple Andrews on just the LKML, and at least two -
one of whom is much more prominent than I am - in the direct address
list for this discussion, I'm not sure whether or not this is a
sufficient attribution. If it work
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:33:41PM -0500, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> The associated dmesg (obtained yesterday from booting with the
> Flash drive connected) is attached.
This dmesg shows that ACPI is not enabled in your kernel config - most
likely this is the problem. Try to enable it:
1) In the "
Andrew wrote:
> (Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
> mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
> that list
Regardless of how you consider it, that is how responding to these big
lists -must- work.
There is no practical way for respond
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> Messages sent to my address directly are explicitly not filtered into
> the folders I have set up for various mailing lists, so that if someone
> does send me a "heads up" reply for a specific topic on a list to which
> I am subscribed it does not get c
On 2/16/2008 6:11 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide
consensus, possibly because different people have different workflow
ha
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> > For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
>
> I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide consensus,
possibly because different people have different workflow habits and so
are affected by duplicate
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> (Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
> mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
> that list unless you have reason to believe that that someone will not
> see the message otherwise, but in th
(Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
that list unless you have reason to believe that that someone will not
see the message otherwise, but in this case I am doing so anyway because
I see no way t
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks imaging
> > boot CD, which is based off of Linux. I have one particular model of
> > laptop - the IBM/Lenovo R61 - on which three d
add CC (Andrew, Greg and linux-usb)
On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks imaging
> boot CD, which is based off of Linux. I have one particular model of
> laptop - the IBM/Lenovo R61 - on which three different thing
23 matches
Mail list logo
