On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 16:58:38 -0400
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Larry Keegan wrote:
>
> > Just a thought, but has the way the kernel 'sets-up' a USB mouse
> > changed over the months? I mean in a way which would mean different
> > numbers in the above usbmon trace? What I'm wondering is
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Larry Keegan wrote:
> Just a thought, but has the way the kernel 'sets-up' a USB mouse
> changed over the months? I mean in a way which would mean different
> numbers in the above usbmon trace? What I'm wondering is if the newer
> kernel could be eeking out different bugs in th
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 09:53:21 -0400
Alan Stern wrote:
> Please use Reply-To-All so that your messages get sent to the mailing
> list as well as to me.
Dear Alan,
Sorry! As it happened I just noticed this and was about to re-send it
when my mailer crashed...
>
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Larry Keegan
Please use Reply-To-All so that your messages get sent to the mailing
list as well as to me.
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Larry Keegan wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:41:25 -0400
> Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Larry Keegan wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Chaps,
> > >
> > > I have a Microsoft Basic O
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Larry Keegan wrote:
> Dear Chaps,
>
> I have a Microsoft Basic Optical mouse. When I used an earlier kernel
> (2.6 series) it just worked. However, now that I'm using 3.4.51 it
> suffers from USB disconnects and reconnects every 62 seconds precisely.
> These disconnects do not
Dear Chaps,
I have a Microsoft Basic Optical mouse. When I used an earlier kernel
(2.6 series) it just worked. However, now that I'm using 3.4.51 it
suffers from USB disconnects and reconnects every 62 seconds precisely.
These disconnects do not occur whilst the mouse device is open. I have
tried
