ACKed-by: Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matt
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 11:12:21AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 09:21 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:07:00PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > > Greg KH wrote:
> > > > I just am worried that we are
> >
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 09:21 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:07:00PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > > I just am worried that we are
> > > now suddenly keeping access from the last sector for devices that
> > > currently did work just fine.
> >
> > This new wo
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:07:00PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > I just am worried that we are
> > now suddenly keeping access from the last sector for devices that
> > currently did work just fine.
>
> This new workaround doesn't prevent access to the last sector. It only
> b
> The last-sector-(access-)bug workaround _only_ modifies the command
> stream which is sent to the device. A dangerous command is replaced by
> equivalent safe commands.
BTW, one thing about this patch set needs to be criticized:
"last_sector_bug" is a really bad name choice for the new flag.
Greg KH wrote:
> I just am worried that we are
> now suddenly keeping access from the last sector for devices that
> currently did work just fine.
This new workaround doesn't prevent access to the last sector. It only
breaks up a multi-sector access which would also reach the last sector
into sev
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:39:39PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 10:12 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:45:36PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Hans de Goede wr
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 10:12 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:45:36PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > This patch sets the last_sector_bug flag
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:45:36PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This patch sets the last_sector_bug flag to 1 for all USB disks. This is
> > > needed to makes the cardre
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch sets the last_sector_bug flag to 1 for all USB disks. This is
> > needed to makes the cardreader on various HP multifunction printers work.
> >
> > Since the performa
James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 12:56 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi all,
This patch sets the last_sector_bug flag to 1 for all USB disks. This is
needed to makes the cardreader on various HP multifunction printers work.
Si
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 12:56 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch sets the last_sector_bug flag to 1 for all USB disks. This is
> > needed to makes the cardreader on various HP multifunction printers work.
> >
> > Sinc
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch sets the last_sector_bug flag to 1 for all USB disks. This is
> needed to makes the cardreader on various HP multifunction printers work.
>
> Since the performance impact is negible we set this flag for all USB
12 matches
Mail list logo
