Hi,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:17:32PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> 2014-09-09 20:09 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi :
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:52:59PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> >> 2014-09-09 19:11 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi :
> >> > the proper way would be to move everything to dma_engine
2014-09-09 20:09 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi :
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:52:59PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>> 2014-09-09 19:11 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi :
>> > the proper way would be to move everything to dma_engine. OMAP already
>> > has support for DMA engine and both CPPI and Ux500 are alread
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:52:59PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> 2014-09-09 19:11 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi :
> > the proper way would be to move everything to dma_engine. OMAP already
> > has support for DMA engine and both CPPI and Ux500 are already using
> > that.
>
> If so, ux500_dma.c and m
2014-09-09 19:11 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi :
> the proper way would be to move everything to dma_engine. OMAP already
> has support for DMA engine and both CPPI and Ux500 are already using
> that.
If so, ux500_dma.c and musb_cppi41.c should be almost identically
wrapping dmaengine, but they aren't.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:00:10PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> 2014-09-09 18:45 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi :
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:28:55PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> >> Hi George,
> >>
> >> Why dma_controller_create can not be set in struct musb_platform_ops?
> >> Then each modu
2014-09-09 18:45 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi :
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:28:55PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>> Hi George,
>>
>> Why dma_controller_create can not be set in struct musb_platform_ops?
>> Then each module would be able to set dma_controller_create it wants,
>> and musb_init_control
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:28:55PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> Why dma_controller_create can not be set in struct musb_platform_ops?
> Then each module would be able to set dma_controller_create it wants,
> and musb_init_controller would use musb->ops->dma_controller_create
>
Hi George,
Why dma_controller_create can not be set in struct musb_platform_ops?
Then each module would be able to set dma_controller_create it wants,
and musb_init_controller would use musb->ops->dma_controller_create
instead of just dma_controller_create.
2014-09-09 13:15 GMT+04:00 Matwey V. K
Hi George,
Many thanks for the hint. Am I right that we can not have multiple
MUSB DMA modes within the same kernel? It is a pity.
2014-09-09 12:40 GMT+04:00 George Cherian :
> Hi Matwey,
>
>
> On 09/09/2014 01:58 PM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
Can you add a few printks around d
Hi Matwey,
On 09/09/2014 01:58 PM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
Hi,
Can you add a few printks around drivers/usb/musb/musb_cppi41.c to
further narrow down where the problem is ? I ran v3.17-rc1 on my
beaglebone black (a while back) and didn't have any issues.
Now I am rebuilding the kernel to se
Hi,
it kinda helps if you Cc the maintainer :-) scripts/get_maintainer.pl
helps by returning a (usually) correct (and extensive) list of people
and mailing lists to Cc :-)
anyway...
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:08:07PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running 3.16.1 on beaglebone black,
11 matches
Mail list logo