So in summary Orico is lying about this particular enclosure
2018-03-16 16:20 GMT+01:00 Alan Stern :
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Menion wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan&Greg
>> Yes, sorry, I thought it was simpler. I confirm that also the 4
>> endpoints required for UAS operation are missing, so everything is
>> co
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Menion wrote:
> Hi Alan&Greg
> Yes, sorry, I thought it was simpler. I confirm that also the 4
> endpoints required for UAS operation are missing, so everything is
> coherent to say "no UASP sorry"
> From the VID:PID you can see that the chipset is a JMS567, which does
> suppo
Hi Alan&Greg
Yes, sorry, I thought it was simpler. I confirm that also the 4
endpoints required for UAS operation are missing, so everything is
coherent to say "no UASP sorry"
>From the VID:PID you can see that the chipset is a JMS567, which does
support UASP: http://www.jmicron.com/PDF/brief/jms56
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Menion wrote:
> Hi Greg
> Yes Orico is a kind of crap, but it is not so easy to find those kind
> of devices.
> My concern is that we may see one of this crappy implementation of
> device, such that it actually supports perfectly UASP but they
> "forgot" to set something in th
Hi Greg
Yes Orico is a kind of crap, but it is not so easy to find those kind
of devices.
My concern is that we may see one of this crappy implementation of
device, such that it actually supports perfectly UASP but they
"forgot" to set something in the firmware, maybe just the capability
My questio
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 02:10:43PM +0100, Menion wrote:
> Hi all
> I have in my hands a multi bay SATA enclosure, with some unidentified
> SATA multiport but using the JMicron JMS567 USB to SATA bridge.
> This bridge is known to support UASP but in this particular
> implementation, due to something
