On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 09:10:32PM +, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
> Sorry, was a bit hasty there. Should have tested properly.
> The US_FL_NO_ATA_1X flag does not fix this problem, but the US_FL_IGNORE_UAS
> flag does.
>
> The patch should be
>
> *** unusual_uas.h.orig2014-12-18 19:20:12.
Sorry, was a bit hasty there. Should have tested properly.
The US_FL_NO_ATA_1X flag does not fix this problem, but the US_FL_IGNORE_UAS
flag does.
The patch should be
*** unusual_uas.h.orig 2014-12-18 19:20:12.0 -0800
--- unusual_uas.h 2014-12-31 12:55:56.0 -0800
*