Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>
>> Hi Sarah and Alan,
>> I am curious whether the the PME- to PME+ happening on a suspended
>> TI host controller could be used as some hack to signal the mis-behaving
>> redriver. Could such transition be used as a trigger for lin
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> Hi Sarah and Alan,
> I am curious whether the the PME- to PME+ happening on a suspended
> TI host controller could be used as some hack to signal the mis-behaving
> redriver. Could such transition be used as a trigger for linux kernel to
> wakeup the
Hi Sarah and Alan,
I am curious whether the the PME- to PME+ happening on a suspended
TI host controller could be used as some hack to signal the mis-behaving
redriver. Could such transition be used as a trigger for linux kernel to
wakeup the TI host "manually"? I am referring to step 4. of my te
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 16:31 -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Some xHCI hosts contain a "redriver" from TI that silently drops port
> status connect changes if the port slips into Compliance Mode. If the
> port slips into compliance mode while the host is in D0, there will not
> be a port status change
