Oliver Neukum writes:
> On Saturday 09 February 2013 20:16:20 Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> Oliver Neukum writes:
>> > On Saturday 09 February 2013 18:41:52 Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
>> Well, OK..., "generic" then. In the sense that the attribute stays the
>> same regardless of whether the value is hardcoded i
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:27 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Saturday 09 February 2013 20:16:20 Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > Oliver Neukum writes:
> > > On Saturday 09 February 2013 18:41:52 Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> > Well, OK..., "generic" then. In the sense that the attribute stays the
> > same regardle
On Saturday 09 February 2013 20:16:20 Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Oliver Neukum writes:
> > On Saturday 09 February 2013 18:41:52 Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Well, OK..., "generic" then. In the sense that the attribute stays the
> same regardless of whether the value is hardcoded in the driver (QMI),
> or parse
Oliver Neukum writes:
> On Saturday 09 February 2013 18:41:52 Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> All this is unnecessarily complex and likely to make drivers and
>> applications end up using different limits, causing errors which
>> are hard to debug and replicate.
>>
>> Exporting the maximum message size from
On Saturday 09 February 2013 18:41:52 Bjørn Mork wrote:
> All this is unnecessarily complex and likely to make drivers and
> applications end up using different limits, causing errors which
> are hard to debug and replicate.
>
> Exporting the maximum message size from the driver simplifies
> the t