Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:36:20AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> On 10/29/2013 03:47 PM, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> >>From: David Cohen
> >>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:53 PM
> >>
> >>These patches are a proposal to add gadget quirks in an immediate objective
> >>to
> >>adapt f_fs when using
On 10/29/2013 03:47 PM, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
From: David Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:53 PM
These patches are a proposal to add gadget quirks in an immediate objective to
adapt f_fs when using DWC3 controller. But the quirk solution is generic and
can be used by other controllers to
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, David Laight wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be simpler and safer to just do this unconditionally? Sure,
> > you need it for DWC3 because the controller refuses to do an OUT transfer
> > at all if the transfer size is less than maxpacketsize. But it's possible
> > that other controller
> Wouldn't it be simpler and safer to just do this unconditionally? Sure,
> you need it for DWC3 because the controller refuses to do an OUT transfer
> at all if the transfer size is less than maxpacketsize. But it's possible
> that other controllers allow the transfer, and it works in most cases,
> From: David Cohen
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:53 PM
>
> These patches are a proposal to add gadget quirks in an immediate objective to
> adapt f_fs when using DWC3 controller. But the quirk solution is generic and
> can be used by other controllers to adapt gadget functions to their
> no
