On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 02:33:25PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 08/04/2014 12:13 PM, Markus Pargmann wrote:
>
> >> In the long term I would suggest to move the DT probe over to the musb
> >> core code and we wouldn't need the node assignment anymore…
> >>
> >> [0] http://www.spinic
On 08/04/2014 12:13 PM, Markus Pargmann wrote:
>> In the long term I would suggest to move the DT probe over to the musb
>> core code and we wouldn't need the node assignment anymore…
>>
>> [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg94701.html
>
> Really old thread but I just noticed that this
Hi Sebastian,
This thread was about the of_node assignment for the child device
musb-hdrc. Mainline commit:
4fc4b274f9b3 (usb: musb: dsps: do not bind to "musb-hdrc")
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:48:54PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> Is this fixing a bug? Commit 4fc4b2 ("usb:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:48:54PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 05:14 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:54:36PM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> >> It is not safe to assign the of_node to a device without driver.
> >> The device is ma
On 11/25/2013 05:14 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:54:36PM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
>> It is not safe to assign the of_node to a device without driver.
>> The device is matched against a list of drivers and the of_node
>> could lead to a DT match with the parent
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:54:36PM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> It is not safe to assign the of_node to a device without driver. The
> device is matched against a list of drivers and the of_node could lead
> to a DT match with the parent driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann
> ---
>
