On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:39:40PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>
>> Hi Samuel,
>>
>> I've queued patch 1 of this series for 3.7, which should go upstream via
>> the OMAP -> arm-soc path. Also asked Keshava to re-send patch 5 to
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:39:40PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> I've queued patch 1 of this series for 3.7, which should go upstream via
> the OMAP -> arm-soc path. Also asked Keshava to re-send patch 5 to me
> once patches 2-4 have been merged.
>
> It's up to you
Hi Samuel,
I've queued patch 1 of this series for 3.7, which should go upstream via
the OMAP -> arm-soc path. Also asked Keshava to re-send patch 5 to me
once patches 2-4 have been merged.
It's up to you how to handle patches 2-4. The series is a good step
forward for us in terms of cleanup
Hi Keshava,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 07:01:06PM +0530, Keshava Munegowda wrote:
> The TLL (Transceiver Less Link) is an separate IP block, independent of
> the host controller. Basically this TLL operates like USB PHY which allows
> the user to connect two USB transceiver interfaces together direct
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Munegowda, Keshava
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Munegowda, Keshava
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:52:13PM +0530, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Munegowd
