On 09/06/2012 05:27 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> We can use something like "-phy" as the phandle name. And the
>> users can get the phy by using
>> devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev, "").
>> (So the frwrk appends *-phy* to the name and searches). Or we don't
>> have any
On 09/06/2012 04:46 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We should at least add Grant to the loop, I guess.
>
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:46:13PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 05:30:02PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Bud
Hi,
We should at least add Grant to the loop, I guess.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:46:13PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 05:30:02PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > > On 09/04/2012 07:51 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 05:30:02PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 09/04/2012 07:51 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> > >>> Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler
> > >>> property
> > >>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 07:51 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> >>> Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler
> >>> property
> >>> a common name too. So we will not need phandle argument.
> >>>
On 09/04/2012 07:51 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>>> Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler property
>>> a common name too. So we will not need phandle argument.
>>> Please also don't forget to document the devm_xxx and dt binding.
>>
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 04:07 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
>>> +struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
>>> +const char *phandle)
>
>> Since it's already a common function, we may give phan
On 09/04/2012 04:07 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
>> +struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
>> +const char *phandle)
> Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler property
> a common name too. So we will not need phandl
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:58:50PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 03:45 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> On 08/29/2012 10:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> +struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_
On 09/04/2012 03:45 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 08/29/2012 10:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> [...]
>>
+struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
+const char *phandle)
>>
>>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 10:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> +struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
> >> +const char *phandle)
>
> > Since it's already a common function, we may g
On 08/29/2012 10:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
[...]
>> +struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
>> +const char *phandle)
> Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler property
> a common name too. So we will not need phandle argume
On 08/29/2012 05:14 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:43:11PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
>>> [...]
> /**
> + * devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:43:11PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde
> wrote:
> > On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> /**
> >>> + * devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle - find the USB PHY by phandle
> >>> + * @dev - d
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> [...]
>>> /**
>>> + * devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle - find the USB PHY by phandle
>>> + * @dev - device that requests this phy
>>> + * @phandle - name of the property holding the phy phand
On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
[...]
>> /**
>> + * devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle - find the USB PHY by phandle
>> + * @dev - device that requests this phy
>> + * @phandle - name of the property holding the phy phandle value
>> + *
>> + * Returns the phy driver associated with the given
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
>> Did you try both enableing and disabing DT pass build?
>
> Impossible on mx28 :) The platform always selects USE_DT, but on imx it
> builds without DT support.
>
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012
On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> Did you try both enableing and disabing DT pass build?
Impossible on mx28 :) The platform always selects USE_DT, but on imx it
builds without DT support.
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:22:53PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> From: Kishon Vijay Abraha
Hi Marc,
Did you try both enableing and disabing DT pass build?
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:22:53PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
>
> This patch adds an API to get usb phy by passing a device node phandle value.
> The new added devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle() funct
19 matches
Mail list logo
