Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: mark init as late_initcall

2013-10-01 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:17:56AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Chen Peter-B29397, > > > > > > > Since we introduce -EPROBE_DEFER for udc driver, it will be > > > > > probed at late_initcall if it is defered. When the gadget > > > > > is bu

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: mark init as late_initcall

2013-10-01 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:17:56AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Chen Peter-B29397, > > > > > Since we introduce -EPROBE_DEFER for udc driver, it will be > > > > probed at late_initcall if it is defered. When the gadget > > > > is built in, it will return "couldn't find an available UDC" >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: mark init as late_initcall

2013-09-30 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Chen Peter-B29397, > > > Since we introduce -EPROBE_DEFER for udc driver, it will be > > > probed at late_initcall if it is defered. When the gadget > > > is built in, it will return "couldn't find an available UDC" > > > at such case. That's the problem we met at below link: > > > > > > htt

RE: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: mark init as late_initcall

2013-09-29 Thread Chen Peter-B29397
> > Since we introduce -EPROBE_DEFER for udc driver, it will be > > probed at late_initcall if it is defered. When the gadget > > is built in, it will return "couldn't find an available UDC" > > at such case. That's the problem we met at below link: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=1377064

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: mark init as late_initcall

2013-09-29 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Peter Chen, > Since we introduce -EPROBE_DEFER for udc driver, it will be > probed at late_initcall if it is defered. When the gadget > is built in, it will return "couldn't find an available UDC" > at such case. That's the problem we met at below link: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=13