Re: [PATCH 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support

2012-09-18 Thread Shawn Guo
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:51:38AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > I gave it a test on i.MX1, i.MX27, i.MX31 and i.MX35. All run fine, but > the last patch breaks the imx_v4_v5_defconfig: Somehow it now defaults > to ARMv7 based machines. I haven't looked into it, just reenabled > ARMv4/ARMv5 and the

Re: [PATCH 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support

2012-09-18 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi Shawn, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 01:34:29PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The series enables multi-platform support for imx. Since the required > frameworks (clk, pwm) and spare_irq have already been adopted on imx, > the series is all about cleaning up mach/* headers. Along with the > changes, arc

Re: [PATCH 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support

2012-09-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 17 September 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 01:34:29PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > The series enables multi-platform support for imx. Since the required > > frameworks (clk, pwm) and spare_irq have already been adopted on imx, > > the series is all about cleaning up

Re: [PATCH 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support

2012-09-17 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi Shawn, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 01:34:29PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The series enables multi-platform support for imx. Since the required > frameworks (clk, pwm) and spare_irq have already been adopted on imx, > the series is all about cleaning up mach/* headers. Along with the > changes, arc