> From: Mathias Nyman
> Sent: 03 May 2016 12:11
...
> > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int last_trb(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> > xhci_ring *ring,
> > struct xhci_segment *seg, union xhci_trb *trb)
> > {
> > if (ring == xhci->event_ring)
> > - return trb == &seg->trbs[T
Hi,
Mathias Nyman writes:
>> Mathias Nyman writes:
>>> On 03.05.2016 13:30, Felipe Balbi wrote:
When trying to access our last TRB, XHCI was
actually reading memory outside of the TRB
array/ring due to an off-by-one error.
This patch fixes that error and has the side ef
On 03.05.2016 14:55, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Mathias Nyman writes:
On 03.05.2016 13:30, Felipe Balbi wrote:
When trying to access our last TRB, XHCI was
actually reading memory outside of the TRB
array/ring due to an off-by-one error.
This patch fixes that error and has the side effect
of a
Hi,
Mathias Nyman writes:
> On 03.05.2016 13:30, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> When trying to access our last TRB, XHCI was
>> actually reading memory outside of the TRB
>> array/ring due to an off-by-one error.
>>
>> This patch fixes that error and has the side effect
>> of also fixing some rare situa
Hi
On 03.05.2016 13:30, Felipe Balbi wrote:
When trying to access our last TRB, XHCI was
actually reading memory outside of the TRB
array/ring due to an off-by-one error.
This patch fixes that error and has the side effect
of also fixing some rare situations where long mass
storage transfers wo
