Hi,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:34:45PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > Hi Felip,
> >
> > On 1/17/2013 4:14 PM, Pratyush ANAND wrote:
> > >dwc3_gadget_set_ep_config expects maxburst as incremented by 1. So, by
> > >default initializ
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:34:45PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Hi Felip,
>
> On 1/17/2013 4:14 PM, Pratyush ANAND wrote:
> >dwc3_gadget_set_ep_config expects maxburst as incremented by 1. So, by
> >default initialize ep->maxburst to 0 for ep0.
> >
>
> Although , this patch fixes issue of
On 1/17/2013 4:27 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:14:38PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
dwc3_gadget_set_ep_config expects maxburst as incremented by 1. So, by
default initialize ep->maxburst to 0 for ep0.
to 0 or to 1 ?
ohh..yes to 1 ;)
But do we really need it..or we sho
Hi Felip,
On 1/17/2013 4:14 PM, Pratyush ANAND wrote:
dwc3_gadget_set_ep_config expects maxburst as incremented by 1. So, by
default initialize ep->maxburst to 0 for ep0.
Although , this patch fixes issue of maxburst for default control
endpoint. But, I could not understand purpose of follow
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:14:38PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> dwc3_gadget_set_ep_config expects maxburst as incremented by 1. So, by
> default initialize ep->maxburst to 0 for ep0.
to 0 or to 1 ?
--
balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
