Re: [PATCH] USB: validate wMaxPacketValue entries in endpoint descriptors

2016-08-01 Thread roswest
On Mon Aug 01 2016 14:28:46 GMT-0400 (EDT), Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:04:06PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, roswest wrote: >> >>> Alan, >>> >>> I think it would be more accurate to put Jake Lamberson as the reporter >>> and tester. >> >> I could mention him in

Re: [PATCH] USB: validate wMaxPacketValue entries in endpoint descriptors

2016-08-01 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:04:06PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, roswest wrote: > > > Alan, > > > > I think it would be more accurate to put Jake Lamberson as the reporter > > and tester. > > I could mention him in the body of the patch description. But it > doesn't seem approp

Re: [PATCH] USB: validate wMaxPacketValue entries in endpoint descriptors

2016-08-01 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:18:54PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Erroneous or malicious endpoint descriptors may have non-zero bits in > reserved positions, or out-of-bounds values. This patch helps prevent > these from causing problems by bounds-checking the wMaxPacketValue > entries in endpoint des

Re: [PATCH] USB: validate wMaxPacketValue entries in endpoint descriptors

2016-08-01 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, roswest wrote: > Alan, > > I think it would be more accurate to put Jake Lamberson as the reporter > and tester. I could mention him in the body of the patch description. But it doesn't seem appropriate to list him as the reporter or tester because he didn't report anything

Re: [PATCH] USB: validate wMaxPacketValue entries in endpoint descriptors

2016-08-01 Thread roswest
Alan, I think it would be more accurate to put Jake Lamberson as the reporter and tester. Thanks, Rosie On Mon Aug 01 2016 12:18:54 GMT-0400 (EDT), Alan Stern wrote: > Erroneous or malicious endpoint descriptors may have non-zero bits in > reserved positions, or out-of-bounds values. This patch