On Sa, 2019-03-02 at 15:36 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Sa, 2019-03-02 at 09:00 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:44:13PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > On Fr, 2019-03-01 at 18:22 +0100,
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Sa, 2019-03-02 at 09:00 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:44:13PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > On Fr, 2019-03-01 at 18:22 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > By moving one field around in 'st
On Sa, 2019-03-02 at 09:00 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:44:13PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Fr, 2019-03-01 at 18:22 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > By moving one field around in 'struct urb' we reduce the size of the
> > > structure by 8 bytes.
> >
>
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:44:13PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Fr, 2019-03-01 at 18:22 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > By moving one field around in 'struct urb' we reduce the size of the
> > structure by 8 bytes.
>
> If you are going for this I have to ask why unlink and status
> are fu
On Fr, 2019-03-01 at 18:22 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> By moving one field around in 'struct urb' we reduce the size of the
> structure by 8 bytes.
If you are going for this I have to ask why unlink and status
are full size ints anyway.
Regards
Oliver
