Re: [PATCH] USB: fix missed resume for auto-suspend failed interface

2012-09-20 Thread Oliver Neukum
On Thursday 20 September 2012 16:26:18 Ming Lei wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > On Thursday 20 September 2012 13:28:51 Ming Lei wrote: > >> If one usb interface driver returns failure from its > >> suspend(auto) callback inside usb_suspend_both, its > >> resume()

Re: [PATCH] USB: fix missed resume for auto-suspend failed interface

2012-09-20 Thread Ming Lei
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Thursday 20 September 2012 13:28:51 Ming Lei wrote: >> If one usb interface driver returns failure from its >> suspend(auto) callback inside usb_suspend_both, its >> resume() callback should be called to recover its >> working state. > > N

Re: [PATCH] USB: fix missed resume for auto-suspend failed interface

2012-09-20 Thread Oliver Neukum
On Thursday 20 September 2012 13:28:51 Ming Lei wrote: > If one usb interface driver returns failure from its > suspend(auto) callback inside usb_suspend_both, its > resume() callback should be called to recover its > working state. NO! The interface is defined so that if you fail, this is your p