On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, victor wrote:
> Alan,
>
> The partial patch is here. In fact I am using file_storage.c in u-boot, the
> context and buf pointer are mismatch when the value is returned back from
> irq routine. The file-storage.c is not in u-boot release, so I post my
> question on linux usb. I
>> In file_storage.c, send_status(), if (transport_is_bbb()), I add the
>> line
>> bh->inreq->buf = bh -> buf,
>>
>> and in get_next_command(), if (transport_is_bbb()), I add the line
>> bh->outreq->context = bh, to make the bh address to be the same.
>>
>> Is this patch ok?
> What patch? You
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, victor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In usb gadget file_storage.c, check_command(), the part "Check that only
> command bytes listed in the mask are non-zero" cannot handle the
> SCSI_INQUIRY command of 12 01 80 00 FF 00
>
> The code will return EINVAL.
>
> Is this a bug?
No.
Alan S
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, victor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In file_storage.c, send_status(), if (transport_is_bbb()), I add the line
> bh->inreq->buf = bh -> buf,
>
> and in get_next_command(), if (transport_is_bbb()), I add the line
> bh->outreq->context = bh, to make the bh address to be the same.
>
> Is t
om: victor [mailto:vic...@keyasic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 31 October, 2012 1:20 PM
To: 'linux-usb@vger.kernel.org'
Subject: RE: Linux USB gadget mass storage
Hi,
In file_storage.c, send_status(), if (transport_is_bbb()), I add the line
bh->inreq->buf = bh -> buf,
and in get_next_command(
Hi,
In file_storage.c, send_status(), if (transport_is_bbb()), I add the line
bh->inreq->buf = bh -> buf,
and in get_next_command(), if (transport_is_bbb()), I add the line
bh->outreq->context = bh, to make the bh address to be the same.
Is this patch ok?
victor
-Original Message-
From
