RE: [RFCv4 PATCH 00/13] Configfs integration

2012-11-23 Thread Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 9:09 PM Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > > * Andrzej Pietrasiewicz | 2012-11-22 13:06:54 [+0100]: > >>During its lifetime, the mass storage can require creating lunX > >>directories for its luns. And again, with usbf_option > > On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewi

Re: [RFCv4 PATCH 00/13] Configfs integration

2012-11-23 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 11/22/2012 09:09 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: * Andrzej Pietrasiewicz | 2012-11-22 13:06:54 [+0100]: During its lifetime, the mass storage can require creating lunX directories for its luns. And again, with usbf_option On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: You have first to

RE: [RFCv4 PATCH 00/13] Configfs integration

2012-11-23 Thread Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 3:37 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Andrzej Pietrasiewicz | 2012-11-22 13:06:54 [+0100]: > > >My intention is not to add new gadgets, but to promote the use of > >usb function modules, e.g. f_mass_storage.ko. > finally. > > >I don't use the usbf_option stuf

Re: [RFCv4 PATCH 00/13] Configfs integration

2012-11-22 Thread Michal Nazarewicz
> * Andrzej Pietrasiewicz | 2012-11-22 13:06:54 [+0100]: >>During its lifetime, the mass storage can require creating >>lunX directories for its luns. And again, with usbf_option On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > You have first to detach the gadget because you can't update wh

Re: [RFCv4 PATCH 00/13] Configfs integration

2012-11-22 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Andrzej Pietrasiewicz | 2012-11-22 13:06:54 [+0100]: >My intention is not to add new gadgets, but to promote the use of >usb function modules, e.g. f_mass_storage.ko. finally. >I don't use the usbf_option stuff, though, for the reasons I would >like to state below. Good. In the meantime we deci