On 08/05/14 20:15, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
From: Nick Hudson [mailto:sk...@netbsd.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:57 AM
On 07/22/14 22:22, Nick Hudson wrote:
On 07/22/14 18:46, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
The nak_frame handling would have added some benefit, but wouldn't
handle all
cases.
I'm s
> From: Nick Hudson [mailto:sk...@netbsd.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:57 AM
>
> On 07/22/14 22:22, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > On 07/22/14 18:46, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> >>
> >>> The nak_frame handling would have added some benefit, but wouldn't
> >>> handle all
> >>> cases.
> >>>
> >>> I'm
On 07/22/14 22:22, Nick Hudson wrote:
On 07/22/14 18:46, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
The nak_frame handling would have added some benefit, but wouldn't
handle all
cases.
I'm seeing problems with devices NAKing to the point of confusing
dwc2 completely,
so I'd like to investigate a NAK holdoff sch
On 07/22/14 18:46, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
The nak_frame handling would have added some benefit, but wouldn't handle all
cases.
I'm seeing problems with devices NAKing to the point of confusing dwc2
completely,
so I'd like to investigate a NAK holdoff scheme that's acceptable for dwc2. I
suspe
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:46:27 +0100, Paul Zimmerman
wrote:
From: Nick Hudson [mailto:sk...@netbsd.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:19 AM
On 09/23/13 22:23, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> Here is the third version of the microframe scheduler patch. This
> version removes the NAK holdoff patch fro
> From: Nick Hudson [mailto:sk...@netbsd.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:19 AM
>
> On 09/23/13 22:23, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > Here is the third version of the microframe scheduler patch. This
> > version removes the NAK holdoff patch from the series, since it
> > was effectively a no-op a
On 09/23/13 22:23, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
Here is the third version of the microframe scheduler patch. This
version removes the NAK holdoff patch from the series, since it
was effectively a no-op as pointed out by Matthijs.
I think there was a misunderstanding here - Matthijs was pointing out th
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:23:32PM -0700, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> There were some style-related comments from Dan Carpenter, but I
> would prefer to have those as an additional patch, once we have
> this known-good code added to the driver.
>
Sure. Just add a link to the TODO list so we don't fo
