Oliver Neukum writes:
> On Tuesday 05 March 2013 11:07:05 Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> "Fangxiaozhi (Franko)" writes:
>>
>> > -- commit 200e0d99 and commit cd060956, only put the switch
>> > command into kernel, instead of userspace usb_modeswitch utility.
>>
>> Yes. And that is the problem. It wa
On Tuesday 05 March 2013 11:07:05 Bjørn Mork wrote:
> "Fangxiaozhi (Franko)" writes:
>
> > -- commit 200e0d99 and commit cd060956, only put the switch
> > command into kernel, instead of userspace usb_modeswitch utility.
>
> Yes. And that is the problem. It was agreed years ago that this
>
Oliver Neukum writes:
> On Monday 04 March 2013 23:28:47 Josua Dietze wrote:
>> > I guess the real problem will be verifying that all of the entries can
>> > go away. This type of hardware tends to get old very fast, but there is
>> > always someone having a really ancient device.
>>
>> I will ch
"Fangxiaozhi (Franko)" writes:
> -- commit 200e0d99 and commit cd060956, only put the switch
> command into kernel, instead of userspace usb_modeswitch utility.
Yes. And that is the problem. It was agreed years ago that this
functionality belongs in userspace. Ref e.g
https://lkml.org/lkml
On Monday 04 March 2013 23:28:47 Josua Dietze wrote:
> > I guess the real problem will be verifying that all of the entries can
> > go away. This type of hardware tends to get old very fast, but there is
> > always someone having a really ancient device.
>
> I will check this and add any missing U
> -Original Message-
> From: Bjørn Mork [mailto:bj...@mork.no]
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 9:19 PM
> To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Fangxiaozhi (Franko); Xueguiying (Zihan);
> Linlei (Lei Lin); Greg KH; Yili (Neil); Wangyuhua (Roger, Credit); Huqiao (
Am 04.03.2013 20:22, schrieb Bjørn Mork:
Matthew Dharm writes:
The question is not one of reminding me of what I said earlier
it's one of pointing people in the right direction. Frankly, some of
the fault for this patch lies with Greg and myself for letting it
through. I had just assumed
Matthew Dharm writes:
> Frankly, I consider it appropriate.
OK, I'll try to cook something up.
> The question is not one of reminding me of what I said earlier
> it's one of pointing people in the right direction. Frankly, some of
> the fault for this patch lies with Greg and myself for le
Frankly, I consider it appropriate.
The question is not one of reminding me of what I said earlier
it's one of pointing people in the right direction. Frankly, some of
the fault for this patch lies with Greg and myself for letting it
through. I had just assumed that the Huawei guys had alrea
Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:19 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> [...]
>> In-kernel mode switching was deprecated years ago with the
>> development of the more user friendly userspace alternatives. The
>> existing list of devices in usb-storage was only kept to prevent
>> breaking al
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:19 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
[...]
> In-kernel mode switching was deprecated years ago with the
> development of the more user friendly userspace alternatives. The
> existing list of devices in usb-storage was only kept to prevent
> breaking already working systems. The lon
11 matches
Mail list logo
