Hi,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 06:15:26PM +0200, joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> On Fri 10 June 2016 10:59:40 Bin Liu wrote:
> > The musb ug says the testmde is not used in normal operation, so my
> > opinion is force_host should not be used for hacking n900 host mode if
> > this is for real product devel
On Fri 10 June 2016 12:04:43 Nishanth Menon wrote:
> I think there was some unfortunately choice of words used in the
> thread. It is TI intention to support community effort
[...]
> software, unfortunately these modes do not tend to be well tested and
> the typical "official disclaimer" is "Not fo
On 06/10/2016 11:15 AM, joerg Reisenweber wrote:
Sorry for butting in...
> On Fri 10 June 2016 10:59:40 Bin Liu wrote:
>> The musb ug says the testmde is not used in normal operation, so my
>> opinion is force_host should not be used for hacking n900 host mode if
>> this is for real product devel
On Fri 10 June 2016 10:59:40 Bin Liu wrote:
> The musb ug says the testmde is not used in normal operation, so my
> opinion is force_host should not be used for hacking n900 host mode if
> this is for real product development or support.
You're aware N900 OS aka maemo is a) FOSS, and b) EOL at lea
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:23:11PM +0200, joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> On Fri 10 June 2016 10:08:08 Bin Liu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:25:57PM +0200, joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> > > On Thu 09 June 2016 15:58:56 Bin Liu wrote:
> > > > But I am not sure how this will fix n90
On Fri 10 June 2016 10:08:08 Bin Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:25:57PM +0200, joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> > On Thu 09 June 2016 15:58:56 Bin Liu wrote:
> > > But I am not sure how this will fix n900 host mode problem, since
> > > testmode is not used in normal operation.
> >
> >
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:25:57PM +0200, joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> On Thu 09 June 2016 15:58:56 Bin Liu wrote:
> > But I am not sure how this will fix n900 host mode problem, since
> > testmode is not used in normal operation.
>
> Please see http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=685367 and
On Thu 09 June 2016 15:58:56 Bin Liu wrote:
> But I am not sure how this will fix n900 host mode problem, since
> testmode is not used in normal operation.
Please see http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=685367 and
http://maemo.org/packages/view/hostmode-gui/ which indeed is _no_ normal
hostmo
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:02:00PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Tony Lindgren writes:
> > * Pali Rohár [160607 05:53]:
> >> > Tony, what do you think about that patch?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Tony, PING
> >
> > Yeah I don't know, AFAIK we don't have a generic way to
> > force MUSB to
Hi,
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:38:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello, attached patch for musb debugfs adds option to force both
> > hostmode with speed. It is just example, I tested only compilation.
> >
> > Something like that will be needed for usb host mode on Nokia N900.
> >
> > --
>
On 6/8/2016 3:18 PM, joerg Reisenweber wrote:
Tony, what do you think about that patch?
Tony, PING
Yeah I don't know, AFAIK we don't have a generic way to
force MUSB to change mode without ID pin. If you have figured
something generic for that which does not actually tinker with
the PHY regi
On Wed 08 June 2016 15:04:02 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 6/8/2016 1:02 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> * Pali Rohár [160607 05:53]:
> Tony, what do you think about that patch?
> >>>
> >>> Tony, PING
> >>
> >> Yeah I don't know, AFAIK we don't have a generic way to
> >> force MUSB to change mod
On 6/8/2016 1:02 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
* Pali Rohár [160607 05:53]:
Tony, what do you think about that patch?
Tony, PING
Yeah I don't know, AFAIK we don't have a generic way to
force MUSB to change mode without ID pin. If you have figured
something generic for that which does not actual
On Wed 08 June 2016 13:02:00 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tony Lindgren writes:
> > Yeah I don't know, AFAIK we don't have a generic way to
> > force MUSB to change mode without ID pin. If you have figured
> #define MUSB_TEST_FORCE_HOST 0x80
>
> Can someone confirm on MUSB's docs (and actual r
On Wednesday 08 June 2016 12:02:00 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tony Lindgren writes:
> > * Pali Rohár [160607 05:53]:
> >> > Tony, what do you think about that patch?
> >>
> >> Tony, PING
> >
> > Yeah I don't know, AFAIK we don't have a generic way to
> > force MUSB to change mode without ID
Hi,
Tony Lindgren writes:
> * Pali Rohár [160607 05:53]:
>> > Tony, what do you think about that patch?
>> >
>>
>> Tony, PING
>
> Yeah I don't know, AFAIK we don't have a generic way to
> force MUSB to change mode without ID pin. If you have figured
> something generic for that which does not
* Pali Rohár [160607 05:53]:
> > Tony, what do you think about that patch?
> >
>
> Tony, PING
Yeah I don't know, AFAIK we don't have a generic way to
force MUSB to change mode without ID pin. If you have figured
something generic for that which does not actually tinker with
the PHY registers di
On Sunday 29 May 2016 12:38:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > From fd67b58e3538c0732750ecad915cde736da099dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: =?UTF-8?q?Pali=20Roh=C3=A1r?=
> > Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 16:57:59 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] musb: debugfs: Add support in testmode for forcing host
> > mode
> > t
On Saturday 23 January 2016 13:57:32 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 21 January 2016 20:21:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * joerg Reisenweber [160121 10:45]:
> > > On Thu 21 January 2016 09:41:46 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > Then for supporting the USB host mode.. We should add regulator
> > > > supp
For what it's worth, I tried running the MUSB via the twl4030 on
Linux-Next (I don't remember which snapshot), and it was broken for me
on a DM3730 (OMAP 3630), but Kernel 4.4.2 worked. Are you using
Linux-Next or one of the stable kernels?
I can try again later this week with a newer linux-next
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:54:21AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Pali Rohár writes:
> > On Monday 22 February 2016 09:31:50 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> Pali Rohár writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tuesday 26 January 2016 18:26:32 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> >> * Pali Rohár [160126 06:35]:
> >>
Hi,
Pali Rohár writes:
> On Monday 22 February 2016 09:31:50 Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Pali Rohár writes:
>>
>> > On Tuesday 26 January 2016 18:26:32 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> >> * Pali Rohár [160126 06:35]:
>> >> > On Thursday 21 January 2016 12:30:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> >> > > * joerg Reisen
Hi,
Pali Rohár writes:
> On Monday 22 February 2016 09:31:50 Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Pali Rohár writes:
>>
>> > On Tuesday 26 January 2016 18:26:32 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> >> * Pali Rohár [160126 06:35]:
>> >> > On Thursday 21 January 2016 12:30:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> >> > > * joerg Reisen
On Monday 22 February 2016 09:31:50 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Pali Rohár writes:
>
> > On Tuesday 26 January 2016 18:26:32 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> * Pali Rohár [160126 06:35]:
> >> > On Thursday 21 January 2016 12:30:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> > > * joerg Reisenweber [160121 11:35]:
> >> > > >
Pali Rohár writes:
> On Tuesday 26 January 2016 18:26:32 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Pali Rohár [160126 06:35]:
>> > On Thursday 21 January 2016 12:30:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> > > * joerg Reisenweber [160121 11:35]:
>> > > > On Thu 21 January 2016 11:21:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> > > > > Do you
On Tuesday 26 January 2016 18:26:32 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár [160126 06:35]:
> > On Thursday 21 January 2016 12:30:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * joerg Reisenweber [160121 11:35]:
> > > > On Thu 21 January 2016 11:21:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > > Do you have some pointer
> > > > >
* Pali Rohár [160126 06:35]:
> On Thursday 21 January 2016 12:30:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * joerg Reisenweber [160121 11:35]:
> > > On Thu 21 January 2016 11:21:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > Do you have some pointer
> > > > to the "certain resistor value on ID to GND" spec? Is it maybe part
On Thursday 21 January 2016 12:30:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * joerg Reisenweber [160121 11:35]:
> > On Thu 21 January 2016 11:21:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Do you have some pointer
> > > to the "certain resistor value on ID to GND" spec? Is it maybe part of
> > > the carkit related parts of the
On Thursday 21 January 2016 20:21:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * joerg Reisenweber [160121 10:45]:
> > On Thu 21 January 2016 09:41:46 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Then for supporting the USB host mode.. We should add regulator
> > > support to the USB PHY driver so if the ID pin is grounded, the
> > >
* joerg Reisenweber [160121 11:35]:
> On Thu 21 January 2016 11:21:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Do you have some pointer
> > to the "certain resistor value on ID to GND" spec? Is it maybe part of
> > the carkit related parts of the USB spec?
>
> ""Three additional ID pin states are defined[4] at t
On Thu 21 January 2016 11:21:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Do you have some pointer
> to the "certain resistor value on ID to GND" spec? Is it maybe part of
> the carkit related parts of the USB spec?
""Three additional ID pin states are defined[4] at the nominal resistance
values of 124 kΩ, 68 kΩ, a
* joerg Reisenweber [160121 10:45]:
> On Thu 21 January 2016 09:41:46 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Then for supporting the USB host mode.. We should add regulator support
> > to the USB PHY driver so if the ID pin is grounded, the PHY driver enables
> > the VBUS regulator. That too seems to need some
On Thu 21 January 2016 09:41:46 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Then for supporting the USB host mode.. We should add regulator support
> to the USB PHY driver so if the ID pin is grounded, the PHY driver enables
> the VBUS regulator. That too seems to need some coordination between the
> drivers/phy/phy-tw
* joerg Reisenweber [160121 02:30]:
> On Thu 21 January 2016 09:40:07 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 12:33:15 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > * Pali Rohár [160109 07:16]:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > when I boot 4.4.0-rc7+ kernel compiled with g_nokia into zImage
On Thu 21 January 2016 09:40:07 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2016 12:33:15 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Pali Rohár [160109 07:16]:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > when I boot 4.4.0-rc7+ kernel compiled with g_nokia into zImage on Nokia
> > > N900 into userspace then usb gadget (g
On 21.01.2016 12:23, Pali Rohár wrote:
You probably forgot to specify page in PDF or other location where is
that PHY interrupt. As I wrote I tried to find it, but do not see it
there.
Oh, sorry, I misunderstood what you wrote - I was under the impression
that you can't find the schematics
On Thursday 21 January 2016 11:57:48 Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>
>
> On 21.01.2016 10:40, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> >I do not know now. I tried to find it in N900 schemantics, but do not
> >see it.
> >
> >CCing Joerg, do you know?
> >
>
>
> http://plan9.stanleylieber.com/hardware/n900/n900.schematic
On 21.01.2016 10:40, Pali Rohár wrote:
I do not know now. I tried to find it in N900 schemantics, but do not
see it.
CCing Joerg, do you know?
http://plan9.stanleylieber.com/hardware/n900/n900.schematics.pdf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the bo
On Tuesday 19 January 2016 12:33:15 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Pali Rohár [160109 07:16]:
> > Hello,
> >
> > when I boot 4.4.0-rc7+ kernel compiled with g_nokia into zImage on Nokia
> > N900 into userspace then usb gadget (g_nokia) does not work. Notebook,
> > connected on other side doe
39 matches
Mail list logo