> Robin Murphy hat am 25. Juli 2017 um 15:21 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 25/07/17 06:19, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >>> With arm64 4.13-rc1 I get no eth0 device on Pi3 (openSUSE Tumbleweed).
> >>> The v4.13-rc1 DT works okay with a 4.12 kernel.
> >>>
> >>> Possibly related:
> >>>
> >>> [
> Robin Murphy hat am 25. Juli 2017 um 15:21 geschrieben:
>
> From the subsequent fallout (which on closer inspection looks more to do
> with calling into uninitialised SWIOTLB state than the arm64 DMA code
> actually doing anything wrong), I'd guess dev->dma_pfn_offset is
> probably 0 as well,
Hi Stefan,
On 25/07/17 06:19, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>> With arm64 4.13-rc1 I get no eth0 device on Pi3 (openSUSE Tumbleweed).
>>> The v4.13-rc1 DT works okay with a 4.12 kernel.
>>>
>>> Possibly related:
>>>
>>> [ 15.916350] OF: /soc/usb@7e98: could not get #phy-cells for /phy
>>>
>>> [ 16
Hi Robin,
> Robin Murphy hat am 24. Juli 2017 um 13:22 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 22/07/17 13:29, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > With arm64 4.13-rc1 I get no eth0 device on Pi3 (openSUSE Tumbleweed).
> > The v4.13-rc1 DT works okay with a 4.12 kernel.
> >
> > Possibly re
