Re: [PATCH 1/3] properly report a single frame rate of 60 FPS

2016-05-13 Thread Florian Echtler
Fixed, sorry for the noise. One more question: Martin and I would also like to see these patches in the 4.4 longterm kernel; do we have to submit them separately, or will Greg KH pick them up eventually? Thanks & best regards, Florian On 13.05.2016 11:53, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 05/13/2016 08:41

Re: [PATCH 1/3] properly report a single frame rate of 60 FPS

2016-05-13 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 05/13/2016 08:41 PM, Florian Echtler wrote: > The device hardware is always running at 60 FPS, so report this both via > PARM_IOCTL and ENUM_FRAMEINTERVALS. Florian, can you post these three patches to linux-media as well? These are all V4L2 related so they should be reviewed there. By postin

[PATCH 1/3] properly report a single frame rate of 60 FPS

2016-05-13 Thread Florian Echtler
The device hardware is always running at 60 FPS, so report this both via PARM_IOCTL and ENUM_FRAMEINTERVALS. Signed-off-by: Martin Kaltenbrunner Signed-off-by: Florian Echtler --- drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c | 17 +++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --

Re: Frame rate

2008-01-15 Thread Vijay Ramamurthi
Thanks.. I do a usb_submit_urb and the callback doesnt come back this is my current state. what can i do to debug? Thanks Vijay On 1/14/08, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 14 January 2008, Vijay Ramamurthi wrote: > > Thanks for the response David, > > but somehow I want to

Re: Frame rate

2008-01-14 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 14 January 2008, Vijay Ramamurthi wrote: > Thanks for the response David, > but somehow I want to recover, I use the asynchronous, usb_submit_urb call and > the call back never returns... > > any idea why that would happen, I have no visibility beyond my layer...! > > when would the hos

Re: Frame rate

2008-01-14 Thread Vijay Ramamurthi
Thanks for the response David, but somehow I want to recover, I use the asynchronous, usb_submit_urb call and the call back never returns... any idea why that would happen, I have no visibility beyond my layer...! when would the host, think the device is dead? no of PINGS? what is the condition u

Re: Frame rate

2008-01-13 Thread David Brownell
> I am trying to send 64 byte packets from a linux host into a device at > the rate of 4000 packets/second If that rate is critical, then it should be a periodic transfer ... likely an "interrupt" transfer. > it is a bulk endpoint > i submit one URB per packet > and the device is a modem, packet

Re: Frame rate

2008-01-13 Thread Alan Stern
tead. Have you tried using usbmon (see Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt) to track the data flow? > its a 2.0 system > > ANy idea whats the limit on the frame rate? > n linux..i am using a ubuntu system on the host side Your question is meaningless. There are always 1000 frames per second

Re: Frame rate

2008-01-12 Thread Vijay Ramamurthi
controller just gives up trying to send packets...not sure why? its a 2.0 system ANy idea whats the limit on the frame rate? n linux..i am using a ubuntu system on the host side ADDENDUM *** it is a bulk endpoint i submit one URB per packet and the device is a modem, packet

Frame rate

2008-01-12 Thread Vijay Ramamurthi
controller just gives up trying to send packets...not sure why? its a 2.0 system ANy idea whats the limit on the frame rate? n linux..i am using a ubuntu system on the host side. Any help/ideas to debug would be really appreciated. Thanks VJ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line