On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:43:24AM +0100, Diego Zuccato wrote:
> Sarah Sharp ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:21:29PM +, ashish mahamuni wrote:
>
> > But why do you want the remote machine handle communication? What
> > underlying
> > problem are you trying to solve?
> Seems the ol
Sarah Sharp ha scritto:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:21:29PM +, ashish mahamuni wrote:
> But why do you want the remote machine handle communication? What underlying
> problem are you trying to solve?
Seems the old "USB over Ethernet" thread keeps popping up :-)
BYtE,
Diego.
-
To unsubscrib
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:21:29PM +, ashish mahamuni wrote:
> I am trying to send those urbs to remote machine,where
> I will try to detect my device
> This is client-server apporoach
> I'll attach device to server,I don't want that device
> to be detected on server.
> I want this device to be
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:59:47AM +, ashish mahamuni wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I've implemented my own usb filter. (same like usbmon)
What's wrong with usbmon?
> I am able to capture all urbs that are generated in
> host controller.
host controllers don't generate urbs, drivers do.
>
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, ashish mahamuni wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I've implemented my own usb filter. (same like usbmon)
usbmon is not a filter. It is a communications channel from the kernel
to userspace.
> I am able to capture all urbs that are generated in
> host controller.
That makes n
Hello Everybody,
I've implemented my own usb filter. (same like usbmon)
I am able to capture all urbs that are generated in
host controller.
But problem is those urbs get submitted to usb core
automatically.
I don't want this. In fact I want this submission
under my control.
How should I do it?
I'
