Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-28 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, Grant> I've now merged the driver into my tree and tested it. Grant> The good news is that using only one device node is absolutely Grant> no problem. It works without error or complaint and sysfs Grant> looks sane. Great. Gra

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-28 Thread Grant Likely
On 1/23/08, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > > The question is about the device structure which used to be provided > > by the platform device instances and now there just uses the c67x00's > > device struct. I was under the impression

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-23 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "David" == David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Grant Likely wrote: >> The question is about the device structure which used to be provided >> by the platform device instances and now there just uses the c67x00's >> device struct.  I was under t

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-23 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Grant> Okay, I've had a chance to read through this. I haven't Grant> tested it, but I don't see anything I strongly disagree with. Grant> I've just got a few editorial comments below and a question. Ok, great. Grant> The question is

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-23 Thread David Brownell
On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > The question is about the device structure which used to be provided > by the platform device instances and now there just uses the c67x00's > device struct.  I was under the impression that each USB HCD needs to > have it's own struct device.  I

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-23 Thread Grant Likely
On 1/21/08, Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Grant> Personally, I'd prefer to see the v3 series picked up now (as I > Grant> believe all outstanding comments from the list have been addressed) > Grant> and have new patches

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-21 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, Grant> My v1, v2 and v3 postings were based on Peter's work from about a year Grant> ago. I picked up the driver because Peter didn't have any time to Grant> work on it. Ack. Grant> Peter told me last week that this series merge

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-21 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "David" == David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, David> How does this relate to the "v3" patches posted 8-Jan by Grant Likely? David> Is that the "v3" you were referring to? Yes - Sorry, I should have been more clear about that. David> It's confusing to see two different peopl

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-21 Thread Grant Likely
On 1/21/08, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 21 January 2008, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > Sure, http://peter.korsgaard.com/c67x00-v3-v4.patch (not posting as > > it's more than 100k) > > I like this bit: > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -3832,6 +3832,12 @@ L:

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-21 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 21 January 2008, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Sure, http://peter.korsgaard.com/c67x00-v3-v4.patch (not posting as > it's more than 100k) I like this bit: > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -3832,6 +3832,12 @@ L: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org > S: Maintained > W: http://

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-21 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, >> Changes since v3: >> - Lots of cleanups: checkpatch, interrupt handling, c67x00_ prefixes, .. >> - The dummy platform_device's created per serial engine are gone. >> - Gadget driver (WIP) Grant> Can you please post/publish the

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-21 Thread Grant Likely
On 1/21/08, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 21 January 2008, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > The Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) controllers are multi-role low/fullspeed > > USB controllers. This patch series implements a HCD driver and shows the > > work-in-progress status of a ga

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-21 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 21 January 2008, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > The Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) controllers are multi-role low/fullspeed > USB controllers. This patch series implements a HCD driver and shows the > work-in-progress status of a gadget driver. > > I believe patch 1..3 are ready, and I would

Re: [patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-21 Thread Grant Likely
On 1/21/08, Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) controllers are multi-role low/fullspeed > USB controllers. This patch series implements a HCD driver and shows the > work-in-progress status of a gadget driver. > > I believe patch 1..3 are ready, and I wo

[patch v4 0/4] Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) support

2008-01-21 Thread Peter Korsgaard
The Cypress c67x00 (EZ-Host/EZ-OTG) controllers are multi-role low/fullspeed USB controllers. This patch series implements a HCD driver and shows the work-in-progress status of a gadget driver. I believe patch 1..3 are ready, and I would like to see queued up for 2.6.25. Changes since v3: - Lots