Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>
>> Hi Sarah and Alan,
>> I am curious whether the the PME- to PME+ happening on a suspended
>> TI host controller could be used as some hack to signal the mis-behaving
>> redriver. Could such transition be used as a trigger for lin
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> Hi Sarah and Alan,
> I am curious whether the the PME- to PME+ happening on a suspended
> TI host controller could be used as some hack to signal the mis-behaving
> redriver. Could such transition be used as a trigger for linux kernel to
> wakeup the
Hi Sarah and Alan,
I am curious whether the the PME- to PME+ happening on a suspended
TI host controller could be used as some hack to signal the mis-behaving
redriver. Could such transition be used as a trigger for linux kernel to
wakeup the TI host "manually"? I am referring to step 4. of my te
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 16:31 -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Some xHCI hosts contain a "redriver" from TI that silently drops port
> status connect changes if the port slips into Compliance Mode. If the
> port slips into compliance mode while the host is in D0, there will not
> be a port status change
Some xHCI hosts contain a "redriver" from TI that silently drops port
status connect changes if the port slips into Compliance Mode. If the
port slips into compliance mode while the host is in D0, there will not
be a port status change event. If the port slips into compliance mode
while the host
