Hi,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 03:25:47PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 12:34 PM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> >>had old chunks somtimes,.
> >
> >So what? They were removed as you suggested. Is it the reason to start over?
>
> No but it makes the review harder.
>
> >>You
On 12/07/2012 12:34 PM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
had old chunks somtimes,.
So what? They were removed as you suggested. Is it the reason to start over?
No but it makes the review harder.
You
asked once what of groud work had to be done, nothing happend. We started
discussing how we want
O Friday, December 07, 2012 11:48 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 11:17 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> > On Friday, December 07, 2012 10:15 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/3] configfs integration
> >>
>
On 12/07/2012 11:17 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
On Friday, December 07, 2012 10:15 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/3] configfs integration
On 12/07/2012 10:12 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
Dear All,
This is the fifth version of what used to be called &quo
On Friday, December 07, 2012 10:15 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/3] configfs integration
>
> On 12/07/2012 10:12 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > This is the fifth version of what used to be called "USB Func
On 12/07/2012 10:12 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
Dear All,
This is the fifth version of what used to be called "USB Functions Gadget".
It includes changes after Michal's and Sebastian's reviews - thanks, guys.
I started slowly based coding based on feedback. Why do start over?
Sebastian
-
Dear All,
This is the fifth version of what used to be called "USB Functions Gadget".
It includes changes after Michal's and Sebastian's reviews - thanks, guys.
This is what I have been working on since June'12 and starts looking usable.
As an example I ported the mass storage function, which is
