Re: [RFC PATCH for v3.5 0/2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: fix oops regression

2012-07-24 Thread Fabio Porcedda
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:33:24AM +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:16:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 0

Re: [RFC PATCH for v3.5 0/2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: fix oops regression

2012-07-23 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:33:24AM +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:16:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:50:54PM +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote: > >> > > I would prefe

Re: [RFC PATCH for v3.5 0/2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: fix oops regression

2012-07-20 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:50:19PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Greg: Any chance to get this two bugfixes into the current release? > > It's too late for 3.5, sorry, but patches can always be backported to > stable releases if they are causing problems. As you wish. I repost them in a few

Re: [RFC PATCH for v3.5 0/2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: fix oops regression

2012-07-20 Thread Fabio Porcedda
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:16:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:50:54PM +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote: >> > > I would prefer to fix the bug causing the oops instead of reverting >> > > patches. >>

Re: [RFC PATCH for v3.5 0/2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: fix oops regression

2012-07-19 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:16:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:50:54PM +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote: > > > I would prefer to fix the bug causing the oops instead of reverting > > > patches. > > > > Me too, it's just that i don't have much time to work on th

Re: [RFC PATCH for v3.5 0/2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: fix oops regression

2012-07-19 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:50:54PM +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote: > > I would prefer to fix the bug causing the oops instead of reverting patches. > > Me too, it's just that i don't have much time to work on that, and so > I'm not confident to be able to fix the kernel panic oops in time for > the v

Re: [RFC PATCH for v3.5 0/2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: fix oops regression

2012-07-19 Thread Fabio Porcedda
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:50:29PM +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote: >> PROBLEM: >> 1. >> usb: gadget: at91_udc: kernel oops regression when connecting the usb cable >> >> 2. >> Every time i connect the usb cable the kernel got a oops

Re: [RFC PATCH for v3.5 0/2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: fix oops regression

2012-07-18 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:50:29PM +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote: > PROBLEM: > 1. > usb: gadget: at91_udc: kernel oops regression when connecting the usb cable > > 2. > Every time i connect the usb cable the kernel got a oops Don't really see the difference to 1 > 3. > usb gadget arm atmel at91_udc

[RFC PATCH for v3.5 0/2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: fix oops regression

2012-07-16 Thread Fabio Porcedda
Hi all, as reported in previous emails, me and Mario Jorge Isidoro have reported a kernel oops using the at91_udc & g_ether driver: http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=134139521606528&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=134159125907159&w=2 PROBLEM: 1. usb: gadget: at91_udc: kernel oops regression whe