Hi Christoph and everyone,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:51 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:50 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:11:35PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 10:58 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Please don
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:50 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:11:35PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 10:58 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Please don't introduce new DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT users, it is
> > > a rather horrible interface, and
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:11:35PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 10:58 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Please don't introduce new DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT users, it is
> > a rather horrible interface, and I plan to kill it off rather sooner
> > than later. I plan to post
On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 10:58 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Please don't introduce new DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT users, it is
> a rather horrible interface, and I plan to kill it off rather sooner
> than later. I plan to post some patches for a better interface
> that can reuse the normal dma_sync
Please don't introduce new DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT users, it is
a rather horrible interface, and I plan to kill it off rather sooner
than later. I plan to post some patches for a better interface
that can reuse the normal dma_sync_single_* interfaces for ownership
transfers. I can happily include
