On Monday 18 March 2013, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
> > Sure, it's your decision. I just don't want to be accused of abandoning the
> > issue that I caused. It's not strictly a regression because no configuration
> > that was working in 3.8 is broken in 3.9, and embedded systems
Arnd Bergmann writes:
Hi,
> On Saturday 16 March 2013, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:13:52PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Friday 15 March 2013, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > > > Unless something is changed, this patch won't get into 3.9-final.
>> > > > Do you
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Instead of adding these tests for non-NULL pdata all over the place,
> > you could define a static structure with default settings and store a
> > pointer to it if pdata wasn't set initially.
>
> Yes, good idea. Here is a new version. Maybe Alexey o
On Saturday 16 March 2013, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:13:52PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 15 March 2013, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > Unless something is changed, this patch won't get into 3.9-final.
> > > > Do you want Greg to move it to his usb-lin
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:13:52PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 March 2013, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Unless something is changed, this patch won't get into 3.9-final.
> > > Do you want Greg to move it to his usb-linus branch?
> >
> > It's a bit too "big" for 3.9-final, sorry
Hello.
On 03/16/2013 12:11 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 15 March 2013, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
a) Apply Roger's patch for 3.9, and add my "USB: EHCI: DT support
for generic bus glue" patch on top after it has been tested
Arnd, sorry, where can I find this patch? Archive search
On Friday 15 March 2013, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Unless something is changed, this patch won't get into 3.9-final.
> > Do you want Greg to move it to his usb-linus branch?
>
> It's a bit too "big" for 3.9-final, sorry.
Would you consider the hot fix at the start of this thread for 3.9
the
On Friday 15 March 2013, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >
> > a) Apply Roger's patch for 3.9, and add my "USB: EHCI: DT support
> > for generic bus glue" patch on top after it has been tested
>
> Arnd, sorry, where can I find this patch? Archive search doesn't
> turn up anything...
It's in thi
Hello.
On 03/15/2013 11:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 15 March 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
I just got an automated message from Greg:
--
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
USB:
On Friday 15 March 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> I just got an automated message from Greg:
>
> --
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>
> USB: EHCI: split ehci-omap out to a separate driver
On Friday 15 March 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > @@ -89,12 +90,17 @@ static int ehci_platform_probe(struct platform_device
> > *dev)
> > return -ENXIO;
> > }
> >
> > - if (pdata->power_on) {
> > + if (pdata && pdata->power_on) {
> >
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 03:19:08PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Friday 15 March 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > Roger just submitted my patch to split out ehci-omap.
> >
> > Ok, if we can merge that for 3.9, the main issue will be resolved, because
>
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 March 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Roger just submitted my patch to split out ehci-omap.
>
> Ok, if we can merge that for 3.9, the main issue will be resolved, because
> an OMAP+Orion config is much more interesting in practice than adding
>
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 March 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Roger just submitted my patch to split out ehci-omap.
>
> Ok, if we can merge that for 3.9, the main issue will be resolved, because
> an OMAP+Orion config is much more interesting in practice than adding
>
On Friday 15 March 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> Roger just submitted my patch to split out ehci-omap.
Ok, if we can merge that for 3.9, the main issue will be resolved, because
an OMAP+Orion config is much more interesting in practice than adding
VT8500 to the mix.
An alternative for VT8500 would be
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A number of ARM platforms were changed in linux-3.9 so they can be enabled
> at a single kernel configuration. Unfortunately, the necessary changes for
> the EHCI driver were not ready in time and the first attempt to split out
> the EHCI bus glues into
On Friday 15 March 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> @@ -1409,10 +1409,20 @@ static int __init ehci_hcd_init(void)
> if (retval < 0)
> goto clean4;
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef OMAP_PLATFORM_DRIVER
> + retval = platform_driver_register(&OMAP_PLATFORM_DRIVER);
> + if (retva
A number of ARM platforms were changed in linux-3.9 so they can be enabled
at a single kernel configuration. Unfortunately, the necessary changes for
the EHCI driver were not ready in time and the first attempt to split out
the EHCI bus glues into separate modules had to get reverted before the
mer
18 matches
Mail list logo
