On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 10:12 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
>
> > cdc_ncm disagrees with usbnet about how much framing overhead should
> > be counted in the tx_bytes statistics, and tries 'fix' this by
> > decrementing tx_bytes on the transmit path. But statistics must never
> >
Ben Hutchings writes:
> cdc_ncm disagrees with usbnet about how much framing overhead should
> be counted in the tx_bytes statistics, and tries 'fix' this by
> decrementing tx_bytes on the transmit path. But statistics must never
> be decremented except due to roll-over; this will thoroughly con
cdc_ncm disagrees with usbnet about how much framing overhead should
be counted in the tx_bytes statistics, and tries 'fix' this by
decrementing tx_bytes on the transmit path. But statistics must never
be decremented except due to roll-over; this will thoroughly confuse
user-space. Also, tx_bytes