On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 16:10 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> In general we do not want khubd to act on port status changes that are
> the result of in progress resets or USB runtime PM operations.
> Specifically port power control testing has been able to trigger an
> unintended disconnect in hub_port_
In general we do not want khubd to act on port status changes that are
the result of in progress resets or USB runtime PM operations.
Specifically port power control testing has been able to trigger an
unintended disconnect in hub_port_connect_change(), paraphrasing:
if ((portstatus & USB_
