[adding Arnd Bergmann who wrote the patches and I noticed was not cc'ed]
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 05/01/17 19:16, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 05:21:09PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 17/11/16 13:43, Sriram Dash wrote:
F
On 05/01/17 19:16, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 05:21:09PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 17/11/16 13:43, Sriram Dash wrote:
>>> For xhci-hcd platform device, all the DMA parameters are not
>>> configured properly, notably dma ops for dwc3 devices.
>>>
>>> The idea here is
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 05:21:09PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17/11/16 13:43, Sriram Dash wrote:
> > For xhci-hcd platform device, all the DMA parameters are not
> > configured properly, notably dma ops for dwc3 devices.
> >
> > The idea here is that you pass in the parent of_node a
Hi,
On 17/11/16 13:43, Sriram Dash wrote:
> For xhci-hcd platform device, all the DMA parameters are not
> configured properly, notably dma ops for dwc3 devices.
>
> The idea here is that you pass in the parent of_node along
> with the child device pointer, so it would behave exactly
> like the p
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Sriram Dash wrote:
> For xhci-hcd platform device, all the DMA parameters are not
> configured properly, notably dma ops for dwc3 devices.
>
> The idea here is that you pass in the parent of_node along
> with the child device pointer, so it would behave exactly
> l
For xhci-hcd platform device, all the DMA parameters are not
configured properly, notably dma ops for dwc3 devices.
The idea here is that you pass in the parent of_node along
with the child device pointer, so it would behave exactly
like the parent already does. The difference is that it also
hand
