> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
Hi,
>> Just that it's an unneeded extra level of indirection.
Daniel> Ok, alright. Sent v4 right now.
Thanks!
Daniel> Thanks for your feedback! Much appreciated. Btw - did you try
Daniel> that on your board yet? Does it work for you as well?
Sorry, n
On 10.04.2013 21:15, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Daniel> +struct musb_hcd_link {
> Daniel> +struct musb *musb;
> Daniel> +};
> Daniel> +
> Daniel> +struct musb *hcd_to_musb(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> Daniel> +{
> Daniel> +struct musb_hcd_l
> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
Hi,
Daniel> +struct musb_hcd_link {
Daniel> + struct musb *musb;
Daniel> +};
Daniel> +
Daniel> +struct musb *hcd_to_musb(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
Daniel> +{
Daniel> + struct musb_hcd_link *link = (struct musb_hcd_link *)
hcd->hcd_priv;
Daniel>
On 10.04.2013 20:54, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>
> Daniel> The musb struct is currently allocated along with the hcd, which
> makes
> Daniel> it difficult to build a driver that only acts as gadget device.
>
> Daniel> Fix this by allocating musb directly,
> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
Daniel> The musb struct is currently allocated along with the hcd, which makes
Daniel> it difficult to build a driver that only acts as gadget device.
Daniel> Fix this by allocating musb directly, and keep the hcd around as
Daniel> a pointer in the musb
The musb struct is currently allocated along with the hcd, which makes
it difficult to build a driver that only acts as gadget device.
Fix this by allocating musb directly, and keep the hcd around as
a pointer in the musb struct.
struct hc_driver musb_hc_driver can now also be static to musb_host
