On 08/05/14 20:15, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
From: Nick Hudson [mailto:sk...@netbsd.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:57 AM
On 07/22/14 22:22, Nick Hudson wrote:
On 07/22/14 18:46, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
The nak_frame handling would have added some benefit, but wouldn't
handle all
cases.
I'm s
> From: Nick Hudson [mailto:sk...@netbsd.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:57 AM
>
> On 07/22/14 22:22, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > On 07/22/14 18:46, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> >>
> >>> The nak_frame handling would have added some benefit, but wouldn't
> >>> handle all
> >>> cases.
> >>>
> >>> I'm
On 07/22/14 22:22, Nick Hudson wrote:
On 07/22/14 18:46, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
The nak_frame handling would have added some benefit, but wouldn't
handle all
cases.
I'm seeing problems with devices NAKing to the point of confusing
dwc2 completely,
so I'd like to investigate a NAK holdoff sch
On 07/22/14 18:46, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
The nak_frame handling would have added some benefit, but wouldn't handle all
cases.
I'm seeing problems with devices NAKing to the point of confusing dwc2
completely,
so I'd like to investigate a NAK holdoff scheme that's acceptable for dwc2. I
suspe
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:46:27 +0100, Paul Zimmerman
wrote:
From: Nick Hudson [mailto:sk...@netbsd.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:19 AM
On 09/23/13 22:23, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> Here is the third version of the microframe scheduler patch. This
> version removes the NAK holdoff patch fro
> From: Nick Hudson [mailto:sk...@netbsd.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:19 AM
>
> On 09/23/13 22:23, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > Here is the third version of the microframe scheduler patch. This
> > version removes the NAK holdoff patch from the series, since it
> > was effectively a no-op a
On 09/23/13 22:23, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
Here is the third version of the microframe scheduler patch. This
version removes the NAK holdoff patch from the series, since it
was effectively a no-op as pointed out by Matthijs.
I think there was a misunderstanding here - Matthijs was pointing out th
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:23:32PM -0700, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> There were some style-related comments from Dan Carpenter, but I
> would prefer to have those as an additional patch, once we have
> this known-good code added to the driver.
>
Sure. Just add a link to the TODO list so we don't fo
Here is the third version of the microframe scheduler patch. This
version removes the NAK holdoff patch from the series, since it
was effectively a no-op as pointed out by Matthijs. It also splits
out into a separate patch one hunk which was not part of the
downstream patch. It also acknowledges de
