RE: [PATCH v3] usb: rh_call_control tbuf potential future overflow fix

2013-08-13 Thread Stalley, Sean
er.kernel.org; Sarah Sharp; Ismail, Abdul R; Alan Stern > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: rh_call_control tbuf potential future overflow > fix > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:16:24PM +, Stalley, Sean wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > &g

Re: [PATCH v3] usb: rh_call_control tbuf potential future overflow fix

2013-08-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
; Sarah Sharp; Ismail, Abdul R; Alan Stern > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: rh_call_control tbuf potential future overflow > > fix > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:25AM -0700, Sean O. Stalley wrote: > > > rh_call_control() contains a buffer, tbuf, which it

RE: [PATCH v3] usb: rh_call_control tbuf potential future overflow fix

2013-08-12 Thread Stalley, Sean
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org] > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:32 PM > To: Stalley, Sean > Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; Sarah Sharp; Ismail, Abdul R; Alan Stern > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: rh_call_control tbu

Re: [PATCH v3] usb: rh_call_control tbuf potential future overflow fix

2013-08-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:25AM -0700, Sean O. Stalley wrote: > rh_call_control() contains a buffer, tbuf, which it uses to hold > USB descriptors. These discriptors are eventually copied into the > transfer_buffer in the URB. The buffer in the URB is dynamically > defined and is always large en