On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Julius Werner wrote:
> >> +extern int usb_for_each_dev(void *data, int (*fn)(struct usb_device *,
> >> void *));
> >
> > Line is too long.
>
> The limit is 80 (inclusive), right? Without the diff's leading '+' I
> count exactly that...
Oh, okay, sorry. I was fooled by the
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Julius Werner wrote:
>
>> The current EHCI code sleeps a flat 110ms in the resume path if there
>> was a USB 1.1 device connected to its companion controller during
>> suspend, waiting for the device to reappear and reset so
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Julius Werner wrote:
> The current EHCI code sleeps a flat 110ms in the resume path if there
> was a USB 1.1 device connected to its companion controller during
> suspend, waiting for the device to reappear and reset so that it can be
> handed back to the companion. This is ne
The current EHCI code sleeps a flat 110ms in the resume path if there
was a USB 1.1 device connected to its companion controller during
suspend, waiting for the device to reappear and reset so that it can be
handed back to the companion. This is necessary if the device uses
persist, so that the com
