On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 12:15 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> I mean, -rc8 is out, if you fix your patches up right now, how much
> testing can you do in the next couple days ? Patches need to soak in
> linux-next for a while. Even if Greg would accept a pull request, I'm
> not sure I'd feel comforta
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 06:16:15PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 09:58 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 04:03:08PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 12:15 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > > > ps: can you
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 09:58 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 04:03:08PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 12:15 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > > ps: can you guys, please, just send your dwc3 glue layer ? :-)
> > > >
> > > > Ivan Ivano
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 04:03:08PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 12:15 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > ps: can you guys, please, just send your dwc3 glue layer ? :-)
> > >
> > > Ivan Ivanov (cc'ed) had sent a number of patches for our "dwc3-msm"
> > > layer t
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 12:15 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > ps: can you guys, please, just send your dwc3 glue layer ? :-)
> >
> > Ivan Ivanov (cc'ed) had sent a number of patches for our "dwc3-msm"
> > layer to the list for review, but I think they were still held up in the
> > feedback p
hi,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:13:24AM -0700, Jack Pham wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:45:11PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > + for (num = 0; num < dwc->num_in_eps; num++) {
> > > + struct dwc3_ep *dep = dwc->eps[(num << 1) | 1];
> >
> > Just add a comment here stating that bit0 i
Hi Felipe,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:45:11PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > + for (num = 0; num < dwc->num_in_eps; num++) {
> > + struct dwc3_ep *dep = dwc->eps[(num << 1) | 1];
>
> Just add a comment here stating that bit0 is the direction bit, just so
> we don't forget in the futu
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:11:06PM -0700, Jack Pham wrote:
> Make dwc3_gadget_resize_tx_fifos() iterate only over IN
> endpoints that are actually present, based on the
> num_in_eps parameter. This terminates the loop so as to
> prevent dereferencing a potential NULL dwc->eps[i] where
> i >= (
Make dwc3_gadget_resize_tx_fifos() iterate only over IN
endpoints that are actually present, based on the
num_in_eps parameter. This terminates the loop so as to
prevent dereferencing a potential NULL dwc->eps[i] where
i >= (num_in_eps + num_out_eps).
Signed-off-by: Jack Pham
---
v2: Removed extr
