On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:21:36PM +0200, Michał Pecio wrote:
>
> > > + u32 baseline, mantissa, exponent;
> >
> > Please keep these as unsigned int.
> What's the reason for that? u32 is the exact width needed to perform
> these computations, while unsigned int is something a bit unspecified.
Bec
> > + u32 baseline, mantissa, exponent;
>
> Please keep these as unsigned int.
What's the reason for that? u32 is the exact width needed to perform
these computations, while unsigned int is something a bit unspecified.
> > + /* Calculate and return the exact baud rate. */
> > + baud = (ba
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Michał Pecio wrote:
>
> This commit fixes the following issues:
>
> 1. The 9th bit of buf was believed to be the LSB of divisor's
> exponent, but the hardware interprets it as MSB (9th bit) of the
> mantissa. The exponent is actually one bit shorter and a
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Michał Pecio wrote:
>
> This commit fixes the following issues:
>
> 1. The 9th bit of buf was believed to be the LSB of divisor's
> exponent, but the hardware interprets it as MSB (9th bit) of the
> mantissa. The exponent is actually one bit shorter and a
This commit fixes the following issues:
1. The 9th bit of buf was believed to be the LSB of divisor's
exponent, but the hardware interprets it as MSB (9th bit) of the
mantissa. The exponent is actually one bit shorter and applies
to base 4, not 2 as previously believed.
2. Loop iterations double
