Hi David,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:50 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> I am happy with these patches.
>> Dave, do you have a principal objection regarding these patches, too?
>
> There were review comments and the most recently posted series
> needs to be reposted with that feedback incorporated.
The
From: Oliver Neukum
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:24:57 +0100
> On Sunday 04 November 2012 09:29:49 Ming Lei wrote:
>> Thip patchset avoids accessing auto-suspended device in ioctl path,
>> which is generally triggered by some network utility(ethtool, ifconfig,
>> ...)
>>
>> Most of network devices
On Sunday 04 November 2012 09:29:49 Ming Lei wrote:
> Thip patchset avoids accessing auto-suspended device in ioctl path,
> which is generally triggered by some network utility(ethtool, ifconfig,
> ...)
>
> Most of network devices have the problem, but as discussed in the
> thread:
>
> ht
Thip patchset avoids accessing auto-suspended device in ioctl path,
which is generally triggered by some network utility(ethtool, ifconfig,
...)
Most of network devices have the problem, but as discussed in the
thread:
http://marc.info/?t=13505486063&r=1&w=2
the problem should be sol
