Johan Hovold writes:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 09:31:54PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> I just have to admit that using the per-interface number matching
>> here wasn't such a good idea after all. It just does not scale
>> well when adding new devices, and I think we should break now
>> before we ha
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 09:31:54PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> I just have to admit that using the per-interface number matching
> here wasn't such a good idea after all. It just does not scale
> well when adding new devices, and I think we should break now
> before we have added even more redundant
I just have to admit that using the per-interface number matching
here wasn't such a good idea after all. It just does not scale
well when adding new devices, and I think we should break now
before we have added even more redundant match entries.
This series refactors the device layout selecting c
