> -Original Message-
> From: Hayes Wang
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 10:23 AM
> To: 'Eric Dumazet'
> Cc: Tom Herbert; David Miller; net...@vger.kernel.org;
> nic_swsd; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH net]
Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.duma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 2:14 AM
[...]
> Could you try following patch ?
Thank you. I would test it.
Best Regards,
Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.ke
On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 09:36 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 06:42 +, Hayes Wang wrote:
>
> > Excuse me. I try to implement ndo_gso_check() with kernel 3.18.
> > However, I still get packets with gso and their skb lengths are more
> > than the acceptable one. Do I miss someth
On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 06:42 +, Hayes Wang wrote:
> Excuse me. I try to implement ndo_gso_check() with kernel 3.18.
> However, I still get packets with gso and their skb lengths are more
> than the acceptable one. Do I miss something?
>
> +static bool rtl8152_gso_check(struct sk_buff *skb, str
> From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 4:34 AM
[...]
> >> > Looks like a candidate for ndo_gso_check(), so that we do not drop, but
> >> > instead segment from netif_needs_gso()/validate_xmit_skb()
> >>
> >> You mean have the bridge implement the ndo
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:44:19 -0800
> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 12:06 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet
>> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:52:28 -0800
>>
>> > On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 17:56 +0800, Hayes Wang wrote:
>> >> Drop the tx packet which is more than the size of a
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 12:06 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:52:28 -0800
>
> > On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 17:56 +0800, Hayes Wang wrote:
> >> Drop the tx packet which is more than the size of agg_buf_sz. When
> >> creating a bridge with the device, we may get
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:52:28 -0800
> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 17:56 +0800, Hayes Wang wrote:
>> Drop the tx packet which is more than the size of agg_buf_sz. When
>> creating a bridge with the device, we may get the tx packet with
>> TSO and the length is more than the gso_max_
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 17:56 +0800, Hayes Wang wrote:
> Drop the tx packet which is more than the size of agg_buf_sz. When
> creating a bridge with the device, we may get the tx packet with
> TSO and the length is more than the gso_max_size which is set by
> the driver through netif_set_gso_max_size
Drop the tx packet which is more than the size of agg_buf_sz. When
creating a bridge with the device, we may get the tx packet with
TSO and the length is more than the gso_max_size which is set by
the driver through netif_set_gso_max_size(). Such packets couldn't
be transmitted and should be droppe
10 matches
Mail list logo
