On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:39:40PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>
>> Hi Samuel,
>>
>> I've queued patch 1 of this series for 3.7, which should go upstream via
>> the OMAP -> arm-soc path. Also asked Keshava to re-send patch 5 to
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:39:40PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> I've queued patch 1 of this series for 3.7, which should go upstream via
> the OMAP -> arm-soc path. Also asked Keshava to re-send patch 5 to me
> once patches 2-4 have been merged.
>
> It's up to you
Hi Samuel,
I've queued patch 1 of this series for 3.7, which should go upstream via
the OMAP -> arm-soc path. Also asked Keshava to re-send patch 5 to me
once patches 2-4 have been merged.
It's up to you how to handle patches 2-4. The series is a good step
forward for us in terms of cleanup
Hi Keshava,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 07:01:06PM +0530, Keshava Munegowda wrote:
> The TLL (Transceiver Less Link) is an separate IP block, independent of
> the host controller. Basically this TLL operates like USB PHY which allows
> the user to connect two USB transceiver interfaces together direct
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Munegowda, Keshava
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Munegowda, Keshava
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:52:13PM +0530, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Munegowd
The TLL (Transceiver Less Link) is an separate IP block, independent of
the host controller. Basically this TLL operates like USB PHY which allows
the user to connect two USB transceiver interfaces together directly
without the use of differential transceivers in omap3 and later chips.
The TLL conf
