On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:42:26PM +0100, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> Instead of having a limited number of usable tds in the udc we use a
> linked list to support dynamic amount of needed tds for all special
> gadget types. This improves throughput.
>
Is it better just allocate td at ep_queue? F
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:40:12PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:42:26PM +0100, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> > > Instead of having a limited number of usable tds in the udc we use a
> > > linked list to sup
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:40:12PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:42:26PM +0100, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> > Instead of having a limited number of usable tds in the udc we use a
> > linked list to support dynamic amount of needed tds for all special
> > gadget types. This im
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:42:26PM +0100, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> Instead of having a limited number of usable tds in the udc we use a
> linked list to support dynamic amount of needed tds for all special
> gadget types. This improves throughput.
>
> This patch also adresses a possible momory l
Instead of having a limited number of usable tds in the udc we use a
linked list to support dynamic amount of needed tds for all special
gadget types. This improves throughput.
This patch also adresses a possible momory leak in _ep_nuke found
while porting the request handling to an linked list.
