Re: [PATCH 2/5] usb: gadget: net2280: Use S_I macros

2014-05-19 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hello Alan > > What about using octal notation in all the file and merge the patch > with the other big patch of the series? I am trying to have some > consistency in the file :) Program files don't have to be consistent. You shouldn't waste

Re: [PATCH 2/5] usb: gadget: net2280: Use S_I macros

2014-05-19 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Hello Alan What about using octal notation in all the file and merge the patch with the other big patch of the series? I am trying to have some consistency in the file :) Thanks! On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2014, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > >> Inste

Re: [PATCH 2/5] usb: gadget: net2280: Use S_I macros

2014-05-19 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Instead of octal notation, to be consistent around the file. > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado > --- > drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/net

[PATCH 2/5] usb: gadget: net2280: Use S_I macros

2014-05-19 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Instead of octal notation, to be consistent around the file. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado --- drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c index c3205ec..5b2ab68 100644 -