On 11/15/2017 05:01 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[ ... ]
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck
/* Though I really dislike this new-world comment style.
* It hurts my eyes and distracts me from the code.
*/
Did I somehow introduce this ?
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 04:23:17PM -0800, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
>> At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports
>> variable/batt pdos and always selects the pdo with highest
>> possible power within the board limit. This a
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 04:23:17PM -0800, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports
> variable/batt pdos and always selects the pdo with highest
> possible power within the board limit. This assumption
> might not hold good for all devices. To overcome
At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports
variable/batt pdos and always selects the pdo with highest
possible power within the board limit. This assumption
might not hold good for all devices. To overcome this,
this patch makes TCPM only accept a source_pdo when there is
a matching s